nation.gif (7033 bytes)

NEWSNOTES
Jute Packaging Govt Stick too its Stands

  boxnation.gif (467 bytes)

usm-red.gif (836 bytes)New VSS on the anvil
Fresh moves on exit policy
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Corporate capital
Losing credibility
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Petroleum ministry
Fresh corruption charges
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Bihar
A call to end social oppression
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Shimla
People agitate over death tunnel
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Jute packaging
Govt dalliance continues
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)UP agricultural labour
Chart new course of movements

Special Correspondent

It seems that the government is not all concerned on the plight of the jute industry and its growers, at least the reply given by Kanshiram Rana to a letter of CPI(M) MP Somnath Chatterjee regarding Jute Packaging Materials(Compulsory Use In Packing Commodities )Act, 1987, It may be pointed out that left MPs had written to the minister of textiles and also a delegation of them met prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee on this regard urging them to reconsider the decision on jute packing.

Kanshiram Rana in his reply states that the statutory reservation order is issued on the basis of recommendations of the Standing Advisory Committee constituted under the Jute Packaging Materials(Compulsory Use in Packing Commodities)Act ,1987.The committee considered the demand and supply position of jute goods based on the projections made by the concerned agencies. While the installed capacity of the jute industry is 11.10 lakh metric tonnes for sacking the actual production of sacking has been 6.67 lakh metric tonnes and 8.65 lakh metric tonens in 1996-97 and 1997 -98 respectively which was barely enough to cover the requirement of sacking for foodgrains ,sugar and other export items during 1996-97 and 1997-98 respectively.Similarly ,the projected figures for 1998-99 and 9.56 lakh metric tonnes in 1999-2000 for foodgrains,sugar etc, the production is expected to be of the order of 8.50 lakh metric tonnes and 8.75 lakh metric tonnes respectively.

Kanshiram said that in view of the tight supply position explained above coupled with the fact that there is high seepage of cement from jute bags which also poses a health hazard and that jute packaging is also costlier than HDPE/PP bags,it was felt advisable to exempt cement from the purview of this reservation order.

He said as regards reduction in the percentage of complusory packing for urea from 50 percent to 20 percent is concerned , the main reason is the high cost of jute packaging when compared to HDPE bags. The consumer on the one hand was burdened with high prices and on the other hand government had to provide subsidy of the order of Rs.100 crones or so under the administered pricing system . The government is commissioning a study to study the comparative cost of jute and polypropylene which will help in appreciating the cost differential of the jute packaging materials. In any case ,as the order is effective only upto 30th June 1999, the Standing Advisory Committee will review this position with a view to fully safeguard the interest of the jute sector, and give its recommendation for compulsory packaging in jute sector, and give its recommendation for compulsory packaging in jute bags for the succeeding jute year 1999-2000 (1st July ,1999 to 30th June 2000 ,he added.





search2.gif (14394 bytes)                            
Search Site                           

Ganashakti Newsmagazine
74A Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road
Kolkata,India 700016

email: mail@ganashakti.co.in
Tel: 91-33-2227-8950 Fax: 91-33-2227-6263/8090

©Ganashakti, Reproduction in any form without permission prohibited

lo.gif (5609 bytes)

Home Week Archive Portal Feedback
Content Editorial Headline World Nation Bengal Column Feature

Contact Us
Site Designed and Hosted by Arijit Upadhyay