bengal.gif (8041 bytes)

NEWS
BIFR wants new revival package for Dunlop

 boxbeng.gif (503 bytes)

usm-red.gif (836 bytes)World Bank
S
tate opposes additional conditionalities
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Ajodhya Singh
C
ondolences
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Basu
L
ambasts World Bank conditionalities
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)Dunlop
B
IFR wants revival package
usm-red.gif (836 bytes)SSI in Bengal
A
n appraisal

Staff Reporter

The Dunlop Company management was directed by the Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) on 10 August to submit within a month to the Industrial Development Bank of India a fresh package for the Company's revival under section 17(3) of the Sick Industrial Companies Act. At a hearing earlier on the same day, the BIFR rejected the Dunlop management’s revival scheme and asked the Dunlop to submit within the same period all its accounts to the IDBI which was the operating agency. During the hearing the Dunlop management wanted time till 16 August for getting its present scheme approved by the banks, State Governments and trade unions. But the BIFR rejected the prayer since the Company had failed to present a viable blueprint for its regeneration. The BIFR bench even expressed its apprehension that the Company was scheming to reap a fortune by selling its land and other immovable property since the present management had no intention to run the company again. In such circumstances, the IDBI has been entrusted not only to scrutinize the Dunlop accounts in detail but also to prepare its own revival package for the unit in consultation with creditors, banks and the concerned State Governments.

The BIFR felt that the Dunlop management wanted more time for the submission of the regeneration scheme to shield itself from creditors and avoid the payment of rightful dues to workers. Representatives of the banks and the State Governments of West Bengal and Tamil Nadu had also felt that any extension of time to the Dunlop management would not serve any fruitful purpose. Representatives of the Banks particularly stressed that only when all other processes stand exhausted, then only the sale of the land or other property of the Company could be considered for reviving the company. Before undertaking the land-sale process it has to be ensured that all the money siphoned off to other accounts is returned to the company.

During the hearing before the BIFR Shri Dipankar Mukherjee M.P. on behalf of the CITU, emphasised that the Duncan management's revival proposal submitted before the BIFR lacked credibility. He pointed out that the Company Management’s procrastination and lack of sincerity were clearly evident from the fact that it failed to keep its promise of paying the arrears wages of the workers even after taking a loan of Rs. 44.59 crores on that count. The CITU's contention was supported by the trade union of the Dunlop Ambattur factory.





search2.gif (14394 bytes)                            
Search Site                           

Ganashakti Newsmagazine
74A Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road
Kolkata,India 700016

email: mail@ganashakti.co.in
Tel: 91-33-2227-8950 Fax: 91-33-2227-6263/8090

©Ganashakti, Reproduction in any form without permission prohibited

lo.gif (5609 bytes)

Home Week Archive Portal Feedback
Content Editorial Headline World Nation Bengal Column Feature

Contact Us
Site Designed and Hosted by Arijit Upadhyay