column.gif (9122 bytes)

critic.gif (527 bytes)Economist’s Column
THE PATENT AMENDMENT BILL: THE LAST NAIL INTO THE COFFIN OF ECONOMIC SOVEREIGNTY

boxcol.gif (494 bytes)

usm-red.gif (844 bytes)Economist Column
P
atent Bill, last nail into coffin ofeconomic sovereignity

 

SUDIPTA BHATTACHARYYA, DEPT. OF ECONOMICS, VIDYASAGAR UNIVERSITY

The Patent bill with amendment has been passed in Parliament. The sole opposition was Leftists and a few other parties - who were tiny in number. The present discussion will be incomplete if we fail to take a note on the endless hypocrisy of the BJP government in passing such a bill. The prime question that might arise is that if there is any necessity at all to patent the creation of individual or organization for prevention against the piracy of knowledge, why should an organization like World Trade Organisation (WTO) frame its modality instead of any scientific or any academic forum? The fact is that all the major scientific and artistic creation throughout the human history was made during the period when Patent Law did not exist. The answer is that the WTO was formed in the eighties (previous name GATT) with the prime objective to make the intellectual right a property right. Indeed it is clear that the global capital should impose a world wide rule of property and therefore it was no isolated event that WTO has formulated a blue print that would impose a uniform patent law for all its member countries by 2005 A. D. The rule of property is no difficult to understand. The ownership of property gets further concentrated to the hands of those who have already piled up property in their hands. In the international market too all the advanced capitalist countries have much larger concentration of the property and therefore following the logic of property the lion’s share of the intellectual property will be cornered by them.

Indian Patent Law in 1970 allowed patent right on process but not on the product. This was an advantage for which the Indian government as well as the Indian companies could buy a particular process of production of any medicine or seeds and could modify them with the local condition in the Laboratory to produce almost the same product by using the locally available chemicals or plants. This was the background by which India had been able to supply life saving drugs to people at much lower price than that prevails in the advanced countries. Similarly the Green Revolution was successful in India because Indian agricultural scientists succeeded to transform the HYV seeds of Mexican variety to that suitable for the Indian climate. However under the uniform patent act, i.e., after 2005 AD, these rights would be snatched from India. India would have to accept the patent right on the product as well. Indian people would have to buy a mere ordinary medicine directly from foreign company at an exorbitant price fixed in dollars. India and other less developed countries would lose the right to introduce Green Revolution. In other words the uniform patent act is nothing but an attack on the normal progress of science and technology by the greed for profit of the multinational companies. A continuous flow of brain drains from LDCs to advanced countries is well known. The brains of LDCs sharpen the product qualities of multinationals, with which they wage an unequal war of trade with the LDCs. Despite all such arrangements of unequal trade, the advanced countries do not tolerate that the LDCs should have any chance to fight back by means of their laboratory which is far more backwards than that of the advanced countries. Thus they formulate the International Patent Right that has enough strength to lock the laboratory of the LDCs for ever.

The uniform International Patent Right is supposed to be implemented from 2005 AD. But the greed of the multinationals are determined to extract all golden eggs by immediately killing the bird. They have introduced some transitional rules that effectively implement the IPR immediately. These transitional rules constitute Exclusive Marketing Rights (EMR) and Mailbox (pipeline protection) provisions that has to be immediately (and mandatorily) included within the national patent act of any member country of WTO. The meaning of the EMR is that if any multinational corporation gets marketing right in any country under WTO, he automatically gets permission for marketing right for other countries under WTO. He need not qualify under the national patent act for each country. The Mailbox provision is that each country under WTO has to immediately introduce a mailbox for patent application on the first come first serve basis, according to which the patent right will be distributed in 2005. This is a peculiar clause that indirectly ensures the participation of any country under the uniform IPR in advance.

India like other LDCs received pressure from WTO to amend her IPA by including the transitional rules within the deadline 19th April, 1999. India could easily resist the pressure from WTO. But she did not. The BJP government falsely apprehended that India would have been expelled from WTO. At the time of joining the WTO India did not commit about patent act amendment as an entry condition. Therefore, India cannot be expelled from WTO simply for non-fulfilment of patent act amendment. The process of expulsion from WTO is cumbersome, particularly for a big country like India it must be extremely difficult. Another apprehension was that India would face punitive measures by WTO and USA. This is also untrue. Because USA itself does not place the uniform patent act over and above its national patent act. Even if India would face any punitive measures that won’t affect its national economy so much. It has been proved after India faced a sanction following Pokhran nuclear test. Had India not amended her IPA, he would have lost little. It seems therefore the urgency for passing the patent amendment bill in Parliament did not arise due to the external threat. Rather it was some internal lobby within the ruling coalition as well in the opposition that intended to succumb the external pressure. This surrender did not stem from fear or legal compulsion. It must be a consequence of a deal that has been conducted beyond the public eyes between the government and the metropolitan capital. Whatever be the story behind the curtain, the implementation of the patent amendment bill drives the last nail into the coffin of economic sovereignty of India. It is again a matter of hypocrisy that the BJP as a party opposed the Patent Amendment Bill in Parliament during the Congress regime and didn’t let the bill passed. The Swadeshi rhetoric is rapidly withering away. The class character of the Government is now exposed.





search2.gif (14394 bytes)                            
Search Site                           

Ganashakti Newsmagazine
74A Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Road
Kolkata,India 700016

email: mail@ganashakti.co.in
Tel: 91-33-2227-8950 Fax: 91-33-2227-6263/8090

©Ganashakti, Reproduction in any form without permission prohibited

lo.gif (5609 bytes)

Home Week Archive Portal Feedback
Content Editorial Headline World Nation Bengal Column Feature

Contact Us
Site Designed and Hosted by Arijit Upadhyay